|
||||||||||
| PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
| SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | |||||||||
public interface Property
It would be nice if PropertyDescriptor, and the various reflection
types like Member had a common supertype, but they don't. This is it.
| Method Summary | |
|---|---|
java.lang.String |
getName()
Gets the name of this property |
java.lang.Class |
getPropertyType()
What type does this property |
java.lang.reflect.Method |
getSetter()
This is a nasty hack - TypeHintContext needs a Method. |
java.lang.Object |
getValue(java.lang.Object bean)
Get the value of this property of the passed in java bean |
void |
setValue(java.lang.Object bean,
java.lang.Object value)
Set the value of this property of the passed in java bean |
| Method Detail |
|---|
java.lang.String getName()
java.lang.Class getPropertyType()
getValue(Object)
java.lang.Object getValue(java.lang.Object bean)
throws MarshallException
bean - The bean to introspect
MarshallException - If the reflection access fails
void setValue(java.lang.Object bean,
java.lang.Object value)
throws MarshallException
bean - The bean to introspectvalue - The value assigned to this property of the passed in bean
MarshallException - If the reflection access failsjava.lang.reflect.Method getSetter()
TypeHintContext needs a Method.
If you are implementing this and not proxying to a PropertyDescriptor
then you can probably return null.
We should probably refactor TypeHintContext to use Property
|
Copyright ¬ 2005 | |||||||||
| PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
| SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | |||||||||